Here are several pieces on the horrors of family court, here and abroad.
First research study on how local authorities work with domestically abusive fathers from the Charity Family Rights Group in the UK. The report is available from this site, but there is a charge. Here’s a link to the Baby P case they reference – Warning – there’s a graphic description of the abuse this infant experienced. This article mentions there’s been 30 other similar cases recently (sigh) : Baby P: Born into a nightmare of abuse, violence and despair, he never stood a chance
Excerpt from “First research study…”:
The audit of the 70 case files in three authorities found that:
The majority but not all perpetrators of domestic abuse were birth fathers
- In 57 cases the perpetrator of the domestic abuse was the birth father and in 12 cases the mother’s partner.
The severity of the abuse was stark
- In 41% of the cases the adult victim had been pregnant at the time of being abused.
- In at least 37% of the cases there had been more than six separate reported incidents of domestic violence.
A great many of the children were in contact with their fathers · Only 12% of perpetrators were noted on the files as having definitely lost contact as a result of the domestic violence.
Ø In only 31 cases (44%) was the phone number of the birth father on the files;
Ø There was a lack of assessment and information about the parenting capacity of 61% of these fathers;
Ø In the sample, 48 core assessments were undertaken (i.e. to assess the level of the child’s need/or to assess risk when there were child protection concerns) yet the father was not seen or contacted by phone in 32% (15) of these cases ;
Ø The offer of attending a domestic violence perpetrator programme was made to only 14 of the 53 perpetrators.
Speaking of audits, here are some press pieces from the audit of Marin County family court:
Marin Voice: Audit unveils court problems
Marin court right to implement audit advice
And, lastly, I want to mention that the Huffington Post has been running posts on parental alienation. Cathy Meyer wrote an article that bashed the National Organization of Women (NOW). I suppose the rookie didn’t want to take on all the other organizations that discredit parental alienation:
The American Bar Association, American Prosecutors Research Institute, National District Attorneys Association, and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges…
The National District Attorneys Association says on their Web site, “PAS is an unproven theory that can threaten the integrity of the criminal justice system and the safety of abused children.”
Meyer admits in the comment section that she doesn’t know much about domestic violence but suspects it’s not very common. You’d think she’d visit at least one domestic violence site before writing about PAS.
I give up on contacting the Huffpo – we sent them a sign on letter with over 2o signatories of individuals(lawyers, writers, advocates) and organizations involved in domestic violence and child abuse. They didn’t respond. I then sent them “Case #1” (Katie Tagle, who the judge claimed denied access to the father – the father who ended up killing their 9-month-old son). So they let me submit an article on PAS (posted on my blog below) – a small consolation, esp considering they then ran the Meyer piece afterwards. It was so poorly researched – She read a book on PAS (according to a comment she wrote on the Internet) and now *poof* she’s an expert. Meanwhile, abusers are getting off the hook with PAS, the abuse excuse.
Huffington Post really needs to get some better writers – ones able to do a little research – they owe that much to their readers.